Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Diseases, Department of Cardio-Thoracic-Vascular Diseases, Foundation IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Coronary arterial age for mortality prediction and risk reclassification in SCORE COVID-19 registry: When vascular age runs faster or slower than chronological age Alberto Cereda, Marco Toselli, Anna Palmisano, Marco Stracqualursi, Gabriele Tumminello, et al. Age and Ageing, 2026 Background Coronary arterial age (CAA), derived from coronary artery calcium (CAC) percentiles from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), reflects vascular biological ageing. Its prognostic role in acute settings such as COVID-19 remains unclear. Methods We analysed 1482 hospitalized patients from the multicentre SCORE-COVID registry undergoing chest CT. CAA was estimated from CAC percentiles; ΔAge was defined as CAA minus chronological age. A calcium-adjusted biological age (BioAge) was also assessed. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Results Chronological age and CAA showed similar discrimination (AUC 0.76 vs 0.74; P = .466) and were independently associated with mortality and increased stepwise across ΔAge strata. CAA mainly improved specificity by down-classifying survivors. While no significant interaction was observed between CAA and the 4C score, ΔAge significantly re-stratified mortality risk among patients at high 4C risk. Conclusions CAA demonstrated prognostic performance comparable to chronological age for short-term mortality in COVID-19 and added clinically relevant information on vascular ageing. BioAge meaningfully refined risk stratification among patients at high clinical risk, supporting its use as an adjunctive biomarker whenever chest CT imaging is available.
Short-Term Outcomes of Two Self-Expanding Transcatheter Valves in Sievers Type 1 Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis: The “Proof-of-Concept” CLASS Effect Study Andrea Buono, Paolo Alberto Del Sole, Andrea Zito, Barbara Bellini, Nicholas Montarello, et al. Journal of Vascular Diseases, 2025 Background: Self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (SEVs) are often used to treat Sievers type 1 bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. It remains unclear, however, if different SEVs yield similar outcomes in BAV stenosis, a class effect, or if the unique design features of different SEVs produce disparate clinical results. Objectives: This is a “proof-of-concept” study that compares procedural and clinical outcomes of Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx platforms in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. Methods: The CLASS effect is a retrospective, multicenter registry that enrolls patients with raphe-type 1 BAV stenosis undergoing TAVI at 29 international centers, who received Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx devices. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for baseline imbalances. Primary endpoints included VARC-3 technical success, 30-day device success, and early safety according to VARC-3. Results: Among 389 eligible patients, 155 and 234 patients were treated with Acurate neo2 and Evolut platforms, respectively. A higher rate of technical success was observed in the Evolut group (Acurate neo2 vs. Evolut: 93.4% vs. 97.1%, OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.83, and p = 0.017). At 30 days, device success was comparable (90.1% vs. 89.4%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.68–1.75, and p = 0.733), whereas Acurate neo2 was associated with a higher rate of early safety (84.1% vs. 70.4%, OR 2.22, 95% CI 1.56–3.17, and p < 0.001), which was mainly driven by a lower risk of new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (6.3% vs. 19.5%, OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16–0.46, and p < 0.001). Conclusions: Acurate neo2 and Evolut Pro/Pro+/Fx platforms provide similarly effective procedural and short-term outcomes in Sievers type 1 BAV stenosis. However, Evolut was associated with a higher technical success, while Acurate neo2 demonstrated a lower incidence of new PPI.
Meta-Analytic Review of Coronary Angiography in Peri-Procedural Myocardial Injury and Infarction After Cardiac Surgery Alberto Francesco Cereda, Marco Toselli, Paolo Cimaglia, Antonio Gabriele Franchina, Lorenzo Tua, et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2025 Introduction: Peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PMI) after cardiac surgery is a significant yet often under-recognised complication, sometimes necessitating urgent coronary angiography (PMI-rCA). This meta-analysis evaluates its prevalence, angiographic findings, management strategies, and associated mortality. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Data from nine studies comprising 104,445 post-cardiac surgery patients were analysed. Among them, those undergoing PMI-rCA were categorised by treatment strategy: conservative management, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or reperform surgery. A network meta-analysis compared mortality risks across these groups, with findings visualised using forest plots, network diagrams, and SUCRA rankings. Results: PMI-rCA was performed in 1205 patients (2%). Of these, 34.3% had no significant angiographic abnormalities, 53.7% exhibited graft failure, and 10.4% had native vessel ischemia. Management strategies included conservative treatment (55.5%), PCI (23.5%), and reperforming surgery (21%). Network meta-analysis indicated that conservative management was associated with the lowest mortality risk, followed by PCI, while reperforming surgery had the highest risk. Discussion: These findings highlight the complexity of PMI diagnosis and treatment. The high proportion of patients without significant angiographic abnormalities raises concerns about potential overuse of invasive procedures. Meanwhile, PCI appears to be a more favourable interventional strategy than reperforming surgery in terms of mortality outcomes. Conclusions: PMI requiring coronary angiography is uncommon but clinically significant, with a 16% mortality rate. A tailored, risk-based approach is essential to optimise management, balancing conservative therapy, PCI, and reperforming surgery based on individual patient profiles.
Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in De Novo Lesions in Large Coronary Vessels: A Propensity Score-Matched Study Cecilia Gobbi, Francesco Giangiacomi, Guido Pasero, Andrea Faggiano, Lucia Barbieri, et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2025 BackgroundEvidence regarding drug‐coated balloon (DCB)‐only angioplasty in de novo lesions of large vessels is still limited and mainly focused on paclitaxel‐coated balloon. We aimed to analyze the safety and efficacy of sirolimus‐coated balloon (SCB)‐only angioplasty in de novo lesions in large vessels compared to drug‐eluting stent (DES).MethodsIn this retrospective, dual‐center, case‐control study, we enrolled all consecutive patients treated between January 2022 and January 2024 with SCB‐only angioplasty in de novo lesion in large vessel (> 2.75 mm) compared to a propensity‐score matched contemporary population treated with DES. The primary endpoint was the rate of target lesion revascularization (TLR), while secondary endpoints were cardiac death (CD), target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and target lesion failure (TLF), defined as a composite of them.ResultsThe mean age was 70.1 ± 9.8 years in the SCB group (n = 92) and 67.9 ± 9.6 years in the DES group (n = 92) (p = 0.76). The median follow‐up was 19.5 ± 12 months in the SCB group and 20.1 ± 13.1 months in the DES group (p = 0.47). TLR occurred in 6.7% of patients in the SCB group and 5.6% in the DES group (p = 0.75). The incidence of MI, TVR, and TLF were similar between the two groups (4.3% vs 3.3%, p = 0.7, 2.2% vs 3.4%, p = 0.65% and 9.8% vs 8.7%, p = 0.79). CD occurred in 4.3% in the SCB group, compared to 3.3% in the DES group (p = 0.70).ConclusionOur study suggests that SCB angioplasty is both safe and effective in the treatment of de novo lesions of large vessels compared with DES.
Indications, Management, and Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Coronary Occlusion Treated with Percutaneous Revascularization—A Single-Center Study Lucia Barbieri, Gabriele Tumminello, Lorenzo Mafrici, Guido Pasero, Luca Mircoli, et al. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 2025 The diagnosis of chronic total occlusion (CTO), characterized by the complete obstruction of a coronary artery for at least three months, remains challenging and can be entirely asymptomatic. Since the indications for performing a recanalization procedure for CTO do not originate from randomized controlled trials, this study aimed to assess the indications, management, and procedural outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization (PCI) for a CTO, ensuring that the population was as uniform as possible regarding technologies and methodological approaches. Forty-one consecutive patients who underwent PCI for CTO recanalization were enrolled from January 2021 to 2024. Additional outcomes included mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and the presence of residual cardiac symptoms, with a median follow-up of 449 days and an interquartile range of 230–643 days. Our real-life study confirmed that PCI for CTO has a high success rate and a low incidence of major complications.