Rayan Malick

Scopus Publications

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Efficacy of Eggshell-Derived Nanohydroxyapatite (EnHA) and Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft (DFDBA), Both Covered with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) as a Barrier Membrane in Socket Preservation: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Neha Nainoor, E. S. Shobha, N. T. Prashanth, Vinod Rangan, Rayan Malick, Nithin Shaju
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2026
Efficacy of Two-Point Versus Three-Point Fixation for Zygomaticomaxillary Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Neha Nainoor, E. S. Shobha, N. T. Prashanth, Vinod Rangan, Rayan Malick, Shavari Shetty
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2024
Comparative Evaluation of Open Reduction with Internal Fixation Against Closed Reduction Methods for Condylar Fracture Management: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis
E. S. Shobha, Neha Nainoor, N. T. Prashanth, Vinod Rangan, Rayan Malick, Shavari Shetty
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2024
Efficacy of Nasal Floor Augmentation on the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review
Rayan Malick, E. S. Shobha, N. T. Prashanth, Vinod Rangan, Shavari Shetty, Neha Nainoor
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2023
Reconstruction of the external ear using implant-supported alloplasts-Our experience
Rayan Malick, M.E. Sham, Thyagraj Jayaram Reddy, P.C. Jacob
National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery, 2023
Surgical reconstruction of the missing external ear is difficult, and the results are often far from satisfactory. An implant-retained auricular prosthesis is a suitable alternative. Microtia, malformation, deformity, and partial or complete loss of the external ear may be due to various congenital or acquired factors. A case series of three patients treated with implant-retained auricular prostheses is presented in this article. For each missing pinna, two titanium implants were placed in the temporal bone. After 6 months of osseointegration, the implants were loaded. All three cases were rehabilitated with a bar and clip retained prosthesis. There were two male and one female patient with an average age of 16.6 years. One patient had unilateral absence of external ear and two had bilateral absence. A total of 10 implants were placed, 4 on the right side and 6 on the left. The average post rehabilitation follow-up was 18 months. Peri-implant tissue reactions were observed at two sites. The implant-retained auricular prosthesis is an alternative treatment approach with good retention and patient satisfaction. Long-term follow-up is required to assess delayed sequelae.
Surgical Stent Guided Versus Conventional Method of Implant Placement
Anik Sarkar, Md Mahbubul Hoda, Rayan Malick, Anand Kumar
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2022
Ophthalmic Complications Associated with Zygomatic Complex Fractures: A Randomised Descriptive Clinical Study
Rayan Malick, M. E. Sham, Suresh Menon, Veerendra Kumar, S. Archana, Sheron Mathews
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2022
Correlation of Panoramic Radiological and Intra-Operative Findings of Impacted Mandibular 3rd Molar in Relation to Inferior Alveolar Canal: A Prospective Study
Sukalpa Datta, Rayan Malick, Suresh Menon, M. E. Sham, Veerendra Kumar, S. Archana
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, 2021
Feasibility and reliability of microvascular reconstruction in the vessel-depleted previously operated neck
Ehtaih Sham, ThyagrajJayaram Reddy, MandakuluturS Ganesh, PSuresh Menon, KarthikVishwas Gowda, Rayan Malick
Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery, 2020
Background: Microvascular reconstruction of defects in the head and neck has always been a challenge in patients who have undergone previous neck dissection, owing to the prior resection of potential recipient blood vessels used for free flap perfusion. Objective: The objective of the study is to evaluate the reliability and safety of free flap reconstruction in patients who have had previous neck dissection. Materials and Methods: Twenty-four free flaps were performed in 22 patients with a previous history of neck dissection for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. These included patients who underwent salvage surgery for recurrent cancer as well as patients undergoing secondary reconstruction following previous oncological resections. Flap includes 12 radial forearm free flaps, 5 fibula flaps, 1 rectus abdominis flap, and 6 anterolateral thigh flaps. Results: In cases with the previous history of selective neck dissection, recipient vessels on the ipsilateral/same side of the previously operated neck were used, while contralateral vessels were used in patients with a history of modified radical or radical neck dissection. Vein grafts were not necessary, except for one case. In our series, we did not have any flap loss or considerable increase in operative time. Conclusions: Free flap reconstruction of head-and-neck defects is highly successful in patients with a history of previous neck dissection, despite a relative scarcity of recipient blood vessels. Careful planning and relying on flaps with a long vascular pedicle obviates the need to perform a suitable vein graft. In our present series, careful planning and the right choice of a free flap with a long vascular pedicle contributes to the absence of free flap failure. In our experience, previous neck dissection should not be considered as a contraindication to microvascular reconstruction of previously operated oncologic defects.