Rabi'ah Al- Adawiyah binti Rahmat
@um.edu.my
Dental lecturer, Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry
Universiti Malaya
Scopus Publications
Scholar Citations
Scholar h-index
Scholar i10-index
Scopus Publications
Sharifah Nabilah Syed Mohd Hamdan, Zamri Radzi, Amir Hazwan Abdul Rahim, Rabiah Al-Adawiyah Rahmat, and Norliza Ibrahim
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Rabiah A. Rahmat, Melissa A. Humphries, Nor A. Saedon, Peter G. Self, and Adrian M.T. Linacre
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Sharifah Nabilah Syed Mohd Hamdan, Rabiah Al-Adawiyah Rahmat, Fathilah Abdul Razak, Khairul Azmi Abd Kadir, Erma Rahayu Mohd Faizal Abdullah, and Norliza Ibrahim
Elsevier BV
Rabi’ah Al-Adawiyah Rahmat and Phrabhakaran Nambiar
Springer International Publishing
Safa Salim, Nosizana Mohd Salleh, Zubaidah Zanul Abidin, Norsiah Yunus, Rabiah Rahmat, and Norliza Ibrahim
Elsevier BV
Norliza Ibrahim, Azin Parsa, Bassam Hassan, Paul van der Stelt, Rabiah A. Rahmat, Siti M. Ismail, and Irene H. A. Aartman
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare the trabecular bone microstructures of anterior and posterior edentulous regions of human mandible using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and micro computed tomography (µCT). Methods Twenty volumes of interests consisting of six anterior and fourteen posterior edentulous regions were obtained from human mandibular cadavers. A CBCT system with a resolution of 80 µm (3D Accuitomo 170, J. Morita, Kyoto, Japan) and a µCT system with a resolution of 35 µm (SkyScan 1173, Kontich, Belgium) were used to scan the mandibles. Three structural parameters namely, trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) were analysed using CTAn software (v 1.11, SkyScan, Kontich, Belgium). For each system, the measurements obtained from anterior and posterior regions were tested using independent sample t-test. Subsequently, all measurements between systems were tested using paired t-test. Results In CBCT, all parameters of the anterior and posterior mandible showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, µCT showed a significant different of Tb.Th (p = 0.023) between anterior and posterior region. Regardless of regions, the measurements obtained using both imaging systems were significantly different (p ≤ 0.021) for Tb.Th and Tb.N. Conclusions The current study demonstrated that only the variation of Tb.Th between anterior and posterior edentulous region of mandible can be detected using µCT. In addition, CBCT is less feasible than µCT in assessing trabecular bone microstructures at both regions.
Rabiah A. Rahmat, Melissa A. Humphries, Adrian M.T. Linacre, Arif Malik, Nor A. Saedon, and Jeremy J. Austin
Elsevier BV
Rabiah A. Rahmat, Melissa A. Humphries, Jeremy J. Austin, Adrian M. T. Linacre, and Peter Self
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Rabiah A. Rahmat, Melissa A. Humphries, Jeremy J. Austin, Adrian M.T. Linacre, Mark Raven, and Peter Self
Elsevier BV
Meng Wei Tai, Zhen Feng Chong, Muhammad Khan Asif, Rabiah A. Rahmat, and Phrabhakaran Nambiar
Elsevier BV