Kudiantoro Widianto
@bsi.ac.id
Universitas Bina Sarana Informatika
Scopus Publications
Scholar Citations
Scholar h-index
Scholar i10-index
Scopus Publications
Akmaludin Akmaludin, Samudi Samudi, Nicodias Palasara, Feri Prasetyo Harmono, Kudiantoro Widianto, and Muhammad Muharrom
Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science
Business competition is very important in controlling product-savvy customers. Strong basic service techniques will be the main factor that binds vendors as the final destination in the supply chain through the strength of business network processes. This research aims to create a strategic basis for evaluating and selecting vendors through the integration process services of the multi-criteria decision-making method analytic hierarchy process (MCDM-AHP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) methods. Empirical studies show how this approach can provide optimal decision support for the vendor evaluation and selection process. Eight different types of criteria are required in its apps and must be realized as a barometer of the strategic basis for selecting vendors so that business processes are of high quality. These criteria include quality of goods, payment methods, payment terms, minimum transactions, discounts, delivery times, inventory, and service. The optimal weight for each criterion will be determined based on its importance to the synthesis process and its feasibility tested using mathematical algebra matrices and expert choice apps. Decision-making was based on the results of ranking evaluation of selected vendors through the development of 342 preference matrices, ten vendors were deemed worthy of acceptance and nine other vendors were rejected.
A Akmaludin, Astriana Mulyani, Budi Santoso, and Kudiantoro Widianto
IOP Publishing
Job promotion is the best action of a company to improve the progress of the company itself, thus it must be done objectively and responsibly respectfully. There are a number of benchmarks for carrying out the promotion process which as a whole can be recognized as an honorable action for someone selected through this promotion process, in this study called criteria, the benchmark consists of seven criteria that can represent strength that can be recognized based on company provisions. This rule has two understandings that are interpreted differently and are quite difficult for mathematical calculation processes. For criteria that are meaningful and related to time have the meaning that the weight of the smallest value is the best, or different meanings that bear the weight of the greatest value are the best. For this promotion process, a combination of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the VIKOR index elimination system is used, both of which have far different functions, namely AHP is intended to determine the preference weighting scale while VIKOR is intended to determine the ranking of each alternative over the alternative. The decision on the outcome of the best promotion is the fifth employee (K5) with a score index of 0.00 and followed sequentially (K2), (K3), (K1), (K4) sequentially with a score index of 0.62 ; 0.66; 0.75 and 0.93. This result is used as a benchmark for the best decisions .