Guido is originally from Colombia where he conducted his BSc in Biology at Universidad de los Andes. He migrated to Australia in 1999 to conduct his PhD at James Cook University studying the behavioural ecology of Australian Snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins. After his PhD he worked as a postdoctoral fellow at James Cook University and The University of Queensland investigating different aspects of the ecology, behaviour and population genetics of coastal dolphins.
He joined the Marine Innovations South Australia (MISA) programme through a joint position between Flinders University and the South Australian Research and Development Institute (SARDI - Aquatic Sciences) where he acted as the primary cetacean ecologist between 2009 and 2014. Since 2014, he has been at Flinders University full-time where he leads the Cetacean Ecology, Behaviour and Evolution Lab (CEBEL).
EDUCATION
2001 – 2005 Townsville, QLD, Australia
Doctor of Philosophy ( | Natural Resource Management
James Cook University
1991 – 1995 Bogotá, Colombia
Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) | Biology
Universidad de los Andes
RESEARCH, TEACHING, or OTHER INTERESTS
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science
96
Scopus Publications
4058
Scholar Citations
40
Scholar h-index
74
Scholar i10-index
Scopus Publications
Whole-Genome-Sequencing Reveals Demographic History and Patterns of Parallel Adaptive Evolution in Indo-Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) Across Coastal Australian Seascapes Svenja M. Marfurt, Adrien Tran Lu Y, Benjamin Dauphin, Manuela R. Bizzozzero, Masaomi Hatakeyama, et al. Molecular Ecology, 2026 Understanding how demographic dynamics interact with environmental heterogeneity is central to explaining patterns of genomic variation in the marine realm. Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus ) occur along most of the Australian coastline, from tropical to temperate waters, encompassing pronounced differences in temperature, salinity, chlorophyll‐a concentration and ocean currents. Using whole‐genome sequencing of individuals covering this range, we examined population genetic structure and adaptive divergence at a continental scale. Genome‐wide variation mirrored geographic patterns, consistent with a common origin in the north, followed by two independent stepping‐stone‐like colonization patterns along the eastern and the western coastlines from north to south. In contrast, putatively adaptive loci clustered individuals by tropical waters regardless of geographic distance, indicating strong parallel adaptation in tropical habitats. Candidate loci were enriched for functions related to metabolism and ion transport, with some mapping to genes with regulatory functions. Additional signals potentially suggest involvement of neuronal pathways, consistent with adaptation in a highly social and cognitively advanced marine mammal. Our results highlight the complex interplay between demographic history and selection and suggest tropical–temperate, potentially ecotype‐like differentiation across Australian waters. In the face of accelerating climate change, recognizing such adaptive structuring is critical for preserving evolutionary potential. Incorporating adaptive genomic information into conservation planning, alongside neutral genetic data, will be essential for anticipating population responses to future environmental change and for identifying biologically meaningful conservation units.
Distance defines us: determining dolphin group membership through analysis of inter-individual distances Anna I. Christie, Andrew P. Colefax, Charlie White, Guido J. Parra Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2026 Group spacing and cohesion are fundamental aspects of social structure in group-living species, shaping interactions and ecological dynamics. Defining what constitutes a group can be problematic in highly mobile group-living species such as delphinids. Spatial proximity among individuals is often used to delimit group membership, yet threshold distances lack justification. In this study, we combined machine-learning methods with measurements extracted from drone-based observations to investigate how the sighting size, age composition, and behaviour influence nearest-neighbour distance (NND) and inter-individual distance (IID) among Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus ) in Coffin Bay, South Australia. Our aim was to identify threshold distances for NND and IID that objectively define group membership based on spatial proximity. We identified threshold distances of 18 m for NND and 24 m for IID, based on the 95th percentile of their distributions across all sightings. Mixed-effects models showed statistically significant effects of sighting size, age composition and behaviour on both NND and IID, with effect sizes ranging from < 1 m to 12.6 m. Behaviour had the strongest impact, with dolphins exhibiting closer IID during socialising and travelling compared to foraging. Larger sighting sizes were associated with significant increases in both NND and IID, while higher proportions of juveniles and calves influenced spacing differently, and depended on sighting size. These findings reveal that dolphin spatial structure is dynamically shaped by sighting size, age composition and behaviour, advancing our understanding of the mechanisms governing group cohesion and coordination. The approach presented here provides an objective framework for defining delphinid groups, which is broadly applicable to other group-living mammals.
Population Demographics of Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in Western Australia Marissa J. Hutchings, Guido J. Parra, Rebecca Wellard, John A. Totterdell, Isabella M. Reeves, et al. Marine Mammal Science, 2026 Understanding population demographics is crucial for the effective conservation of species. This is particularly important for apex predators, such as the killer whale ( Orcinus orca ), which play important roles in maintaining the structure and function of ecosystems. In this study, we used capture‐mark‐recapture (CMR) modeling to assess killer whale demographics at two distinct aggregation sites in Western Australia: the Ningaloo Reef (NW) and Bremer Sub‐basin (SW). Using 12 years of photo‐identification (photo‐ID) data from the NW and 6 years from the SW, we applied open population models (POPAN and Cormack–Jolly–Seber) to estimate the abundance ( N total ), apparent survival ( Phi ), capture probability ( p ), and probability of entry ( pent ) of killer whales inhabiting these key areas. Abundance estimates in the NW, which combined females, males, and individuals of unknown sex ( N total = 47 ± 2, 95% CI = 43–52), revealed a small, well‐marked, and frequently resighted population with high apparent survival ( Phi female = 0.98 ± 0.016, 95% CI = 0.91–0.99; Phi male = 0.88 ± 0.060, 95% CI = 0.71–0.96; Phi unknown = 0.82 ± 0.064, 95% CI = 0.66–0.92). In contrast, abundance estimates in the SW, which separated sexed adults ( N total = 102 ± 7, 95% CI = 88–117) from the unknown sex group, suggested a much larger and more transient population with variable apparent survival ( Phi female = 0.98 ± 0.001, 95% CI = 0.97–0.98; Phi male = 0.82 ± 0.012, 95% CI = 0.79–0.84; Phi unknown(T) = 0.65 ± 0.177, 95% CI = 0.29–0.90; Phi unknown(R) = 0.84 ± 0.185, 95% CI = 0.26–0.99). Variation in population demography between the two study areas likely reflects divergent ecological and evolutionary histories shaped by both genetic and environmental factors. Additionally, differences in habitat accessibility, individual distinctiveness, and sampling design may have influenced detectability and model outcomes. These results provide vital baseline demographic data for killer whales in Australian waters and highlight the need for standardized long‐term monitoring to inform conservation management strategies.
Sociality of Marine Mammals and Their Vulnerability to the Spread of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review Caitlin R. Nicholls, Mauricio Cantor, Luciana Möller, Guido J. Parra Mammal Review, 2026 Introduction Social structure plays a crucial role in shaping the transmission dynamics of infectious diseases within animal populations, yet its influence remains understudied in marine mammals. Aims This review investigates links between marine mammal sociality and disease vulnerability, focusing on social network metrics and their influence on disease transmission. The study aimed to (1) identify patterns in disease transmission, (2) map gaps in current knowledge to inform strategic directions for future investigation and (3) discuss implications for conservation and disease management. Methods Through systematic database searching, 14 studies were identified that investigated social network metrics and their influence on disease transmission in marine mammal social networks. Results Results show that stronger associations and greater social connectivity increase disease prevalence, although this relationship varied across species. Central individuals acted as ‘super‐spreaders’, facilitating disease spread to conspecifics and vaccination efforts targeting these individuals are a recurrent proposed mitigation strategy. At the population level, network fragmentation reduced disease burden, while highly connected subgroups facilitated pathogen transmission. Research is concentrated on few key species, revealing significant gaps in taxonomic and geographic representation. Additionally, studies were geographically biased toward North America and Australia, with limited collaboration across research clusters, highlighting the need for broader representation and interdisciplinary partnerships. Conclusion These findings underscore the need for interdisciplinary approaches integrating epidemiological modelling, social network analysis and conservation strategies to better predict and mitigate disease risks in marine mammal populations. Future research should expand species coverage and incorporate ecological and environmental variables to develop targeted disease management frameworks.
Vulnerability of marine megafauna to global at-sea anthropogenic threats Michelle VanCompernolle, Juliet Morris, Hannah J. Calich, Jorge P. Rodríguez, Sarah A. Marley, et al. Conservation Biology, 2026 Marine megafauna species are affected by a wide range of anthropogenic threats. To evaluate the risk of such threats, species’ vulnerability to each threat must first be determined. We build on the existing threats classification scheme and ranking system of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species by assessing the vulnerability of 256 marine megafauna species to 23 at‐sea threats. The threats we considered included individual fishing gear types, climate‐change‐related subthreats not previously assessed, and threats associated with coastal impacts and maritime disturbances. Our ratings resulted in 70 species having high vulnerability ( v > 0.778 out of 1) to at least 1 threat, primarily drifting longlines, temperature extremes, or fixed gear. These 3 threats were also considered to have the most severe effects (i.e., steepest population declines). Overall, temperature extremes and plastics and other solid waste were rated as affecting the largest proportion of populations. Penguins, pinnipeds, and polar bears had the highest vulnerability to temperature extremes. Bony fishes had the highest vulnerability to drifting longlines and plastics and other solid waste; pelagic cetaceans to 4 maritime disturbance threats; elasmobranchs to 5 fishing threats; and flying birds to drifting longlines and 2 maritime disturbance threats. Sirenians and turtles had the highest vulnerability to at least one threat from all 4 categories. Despite not necessarily having severe effects for most taxonomic groups, temperature extremes were rated among the top threats for all taxa except bony fishes. The vulnerability scores we provide are an important first step in estimating the risk of threats to marine megafauna. Importantly, they help differentiate scope from severity, which is key to identifying threats that should be prioritized for mitigation.
Drone Infrared Thermography for Detecting Skin Thermal Anomalies in Bottlenose Dolphins: Preliminary Insights Charlie White, Andrew P. Colefax, Guido J. Parra Ecology and Evolution, 2026 Monitoring the health of cetaceans is challenging as traditional approaches including vessel‐based surveys and necropsies are often opportunistic and limited in their ability to detect subtle physiological changes. Infrared thermography (IRT) offers a non‐invasive alternative by detecting surface temperature anomalies that may reflect localised physiological variation, including changes associated with inflammation, scarring, tissue disruption or thermoregulatory processes. Mounted on drones, IRT can enable remote thermal imaging of free‐ranging individuals. This case study presented preliminary observations from the exploratory use of drone‐IRT to detect localised thermal anomalies in the skin of bottlenose dolphins ( Tursiops truncatus ) under human care. A total of 14 adult dolphins were monitored across the Austral summer and winter, with two individuals exhibiting consistent thermal hotspots 3°C–5°C warmer than surrounding body surface temperatures. One individual exhibited a transient anomaly that resolved over time, whereas the other displayed persistent hotspots that became more pronounced. These anomalies corresponded with external markings, suggesting localised alterations in skin surface thermal patterns. This case study provided preliminary evidence that drone‐IRT can detect localised thermal anomalies in a dolphin's skin and highlights the potential for drone‐IRT as a non‐invasive tool for monitoring health in both managed and wild dolphin populations. Further quantitative investigations with larger sample sizes and concurrent veterinary assessments may provide validation regarding such observations and to evaluate whether such anomalies are indicative of underlying health issues.
Global variation and drivers of shark predation risk experienced by estuarine and coastal dolphins Jerry Hall Moxley, Jeremy J Kiszka, Krystan A Wilkinson, Guido Jose Parra, Michael R Heithaus Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2026 Despite often being considered top predators, small delphinids (<3 m) face predation risk from large sharks (>2.5 m total length) in several marine ecosystems around the globe. Yet, estimating relative shark predation pressure and risk to cetacean species and populations, and how they might vary across ecological contexts, has been challenging. Evidence of unsuccessful predation, such as bite wounds, epidermal scarring, and related injuries, has been reported across multiple taxa and locations, providing broad insights into the extent of predation risk to odontocetes in several populations. Here, we synthesize 41 published studies that reported the prevalence of shark-inflicted injuries on 17 cetacean species across 62 locations globally to gain insights into the dynamics and drivers of shark predation on cetaceans. Using a subset of studies on small coastal delphinids, we further assess factors influencing variation in shark-inflicted injuries. Prevalence of injuries caused by sharks was significantly greater in populations from the southern hemisphere. Binomial logistic regression of proportions of individuals with shark-inflicted injuries across 3 coastal dolphin genera ( Tursiops , Orcaella , and Sousa ) suggests a lower prevalence in areas with high fishing pressure, large shark population declines, and other human impacts. Overall, our results suggest that throughout much of their ranges, coastal and estuarine delphinids currently experience lower than expected predation pressure, likely due to fishing pressure and the resulting declines of large sharks. However, conservation efforts focused on restoring shark populations may begin to reverse these trends in countries with strong fisheries management measures. Establishing and investigating baselines in predator-prey interactions among upper trophic level consumers can provide critical insights for understanding marine community dynamics and ecosystem-based management.
Shape variation in the eye patch and dorsal fin of southern hemisphere killer whales (Orcinus orca) Marissa J. Hutchings, Rebecca Wellard, David M. Donnelly, John A. Totterdell, Guido J. Parra, et al. Mammalian Biology, 2025 Morphological variation within and among species plays a critical role in evolutionary processes, influencing adaptation, survival, and reproductive success. Killer whale ( Orcinus orca ) morphology is known to vary on both an individual and population level with several ecotypes or forms documented worldwide. However, the extent of morphological variation among killer whales in Australian waters remains unclear, both among individuals within the region and in comparison to those in other parts of the southern hemisphere. This study assessed eye patch and dorsal fin shape variation in Australian and Antarctic killer whales to explore the evolutionary relationships among these groups. A large dataset of imagery was compiled and processed to achieve this, which provided representative sample sizes for five separate study groups: northwest Australia (NW), southwest Australia (SW), southeast Australia (SE), Antarctic type A (AA) and Antarctic type B1 (AB). Elliptical Fourier analysis was used to extract the feature outlines and enable multivariate data analyses. Principal component analysis and pairwise comparisons revealed significant morphological differences both within and between Australian and Antarctic killer whales. Eye patch shape variation was driven by the degree of taper and overall width whereas dorsal fin shape variation was driven by falcateness and broadness at its base. Hierarchical cluster analysis revealed considerable variation amongst these features, while linear discriminate analysis indicated that individuals could not be reliably classified into their respective study groups based on eye patch and dorsal fin shape alone. Nonetheless, these findings suggest the presence of both a tropical and temperate form of killer whale in Australia, with the latter resembling both the Antarctic Type A and B2s morphologically. To better understand their connectivity and divergence, dedicated research is needed to assess the evolutionary history of these populations. Such knowledge will be vital in defining global conservation management units for killer whales which are still considered a single, data deficient species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Distance defines us: determining dolphin group membership through analysis of inter-individual distances AI Christie, AP Colefax, C White, GJ Parra Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 80 (5), 65 , 2026 2026
Global variation and drivers of shark predation risk experienced by estuarine and coastal dolphins J Moxley, J Kiszka, K Wilkinson, GJ Parra, M Heithaus Marine Ecology Progress Series 782, 1-16 , 2026 2026
Two Cases of Early Orphan Survival in Indo‐Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops aduncus) From the Adelaide Dolphin Sanctuary, South Australia C Vicente‐Sánchez, GJ Parra, CM Kemper, LM Möller Marine Mammal Science 42 (2), e70182 , 2026 2026
Population Demographics of Killer Whales ( Orcinus orca ) in Western Australia MJ Hutchings, GJ Parra, R Wellard, JA Totterdell, IM Reeves, L Möller Marine Mammal Science 42 (2), e70151 , 2026 2026
Sociality of Marine Mammals and Their Vulnerability to the Spread of Infectious Diseases: A Systematic Review CR Nicholls, M Cantor, L Möller, GJ Parra Mammal Review 56 (1), e70020 , 2026 2026
Vulnerability of marine megafauna to global at‐sea anthropogenic threats M VanCompernolle, J Morris, HJ Calich, JP Rodríguez, SA Marley, ... Conservation biology 40 (1), e70147 , 2026 2026 Citations: 3
Drone Infrared Thermography for Detecting Skin Thermal Anomalies in Bottlenose Dolphins: Preliminary Insights C White, AP Colefax, GJ Parra Ecology and Evolution 16 (1), e72892 , 2026 2026 Citations: 1
Social lives of whales and dolphins shape the spread of infectious diseases C Nicholls, GJ Parra, L Möller The Conversation , 2026 2026
Thermal drones can track dolphin health without having to touch or disturb them C White, GJ Parra The Conversation , 2026 2026
Using drone-based infrared thermography for monitoring vital signs in dolphins. C White, AP Colefax, GJ Parra Journal of Thermal Biology, 104353 , 2025 2025 Citations: 2
Shape variation in the eye patch and dorsal fin of southern hemisphere killer whales ( Orcinus orca ) MJ Hutchings, R Wellard, DM Donnelly, JA Totterdell, GJ Parra, L Möller Mammalian Biology 105 (6), 831-841 , 2025 2025 Citations: 2
Decadal Shifts in Southern Right Whale ( Eubalaena australis ) Recovery in South Australian Waters: Implications for Conservation and Management B O’Shannessy, L Möller, RD McCauley, GJ Parra, JN Smith, S Burnell, ... Marine mammal science 41 (4), e70045 , 2025 2025 Citations: 4
Weathering Kangaroo Island’s extremes: insights into captures, health, and diet of introduced platypuses in the Rocky River T Hawke, G Bino, P Hughes, A Hunter, G Parra Vergara, J Clayton, R Ellis, ... Australian Mammalogy 47 (2), AM24042 , 2025 2025 Citations: 3
Species Distribution Modeling of Killer Whales (Orcinus orca) in Australian Waters MJ Hutchings, GJ Parra, JA Totterdell, R Wellard, DM Donnelly, ... Ecology and Evolution 15 (7), e71359 , 2025 2025 Citations: 4
Ranging patterns and mortality of an at-risk marine mammal resident in a highly urbanized estuary M Newman, M Bossley, R Baring, L Möller, A Steiner, GJ Parra Animal Behaviour 225, 123218 , 2025 2025 Citations: 1
Association Patterns of Indo‐Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus ) in Waters off the North West Cape, Western Australia CM Edwards, J Syme, GJ Parra Marine Mammal Science 41 (3), e70017 , 2025 2025 Citations: 1
Movements and burrow use of newly emerged juvenile and adult female platypuses M Boulton, J Thomas, G Bino, J Clayton, GJ Parra, R Baring Australian Mammalogy 47 (2), AM24037 , 2025 2025 Citations: 1
Behavioural Processes Underlying the Habitat Selection of Indo‐Pacific Bottlenose Dolphins ( Tursiops aduncus ) in the Ningaloo Marine Park and Exmouth Gulf, at … R Haughey, TN Hunt, D Hanf, C Passadore, R Baring, GJ Parra Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 35 (4), e70114 , 2025 2025 Citations: 1
Indo-Pacific and Australian humpback dolphins Sousa chinensis () and S. sahulensis GJ Parra, TA Jefferson Coastal Dolphins and Porpoises, 75-108 , 2025 2025
Long‐Term Demographic Trends of Near Threatened Coastal Dolphins Living in an Urban Estuary K Haigh, GJ Parra, L Möller, A Steiner, M Bossley Ecology and Evolution 15 (1), e70834 , 2025 2025 Citations: 4
MOST CITED SCHOLAR PUBLICATIONS
Population sizes, site fidelity and residence patterns of Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins: Implications for conservation GJ Parra, PJ Corkeron, H Marsh Biological Conservation 129 (2), 167-180 , 2006 2006 Citations: 286
Resource partitioning in sympatric delphinids: space use and habitat preferences of Australian snubfin and Indo‐Pacific humpback dolphins GJ Parra Journal of Animal Ecology 75 (4), 862-874 , 2006 2006 Citations: 223
Dolphins restructure social system after reduction of commercial fisheries IC Ansmann, GJ Parra, BL Chilvers, JM Lanyon Animal Behaviour 84 (3), 575-581 , 2012 2012 Citations: 194
Grouping and fission–fusion dynamics in Australian snubfin and Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins GJ Parra, PJ Corkeron, P Arnold Animal behaviour 82 (6), 1423-1433 , 2011 2011 Citations: 139
Vulnerability of marine mammals in the Great Barrier Reef to climate change GJ Parra, I Lawler, M Noad Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority , 2007 2007 Citations: 135
Mitogenomic phylogenetic analyses of the Delphinidae with an emphasis on the Globicephalinae JT Vilstrup, SYW Ho, AD Foote, PA Morin, D Kreb, M Krützen, GJ Parra, ... BMC evolutionary biology 11 (1), 65 , 2011 2011 Citations: 119
Spatial distribution and environmental correlates of Australian snubfin and Indo‐Pacific humpback dolphins G J Parra, R Schick, P J Corkeron Ecography 29 (3), 396-406 , 2006 2006 Citations: 116
Integrating multiple lines of evidence to better understand the evolutionary divergence of humpback dolphins along their entire distribution range: a new dolphin species in … M Mendez, TA Jefferson, SO Kolokotronis, M Krützen, GJ Parra, T Collins, ... Molecular ecology 22 (23), 5936-5948 , 2013 2013 Citations: 102
The Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin, Sousa chinensis (Osbeck, 1765), in Australian waters: a summary of current knowledge GJ Parra, PJ Corkeron, H Marsh Aquatic Mammals 30 (1), 197-206 , 2004 2004 Citations: 95
Fine‐scale genetic population structure in a mobile marine mammal: inshore bottlenose dolphins in Moreton Bay, Australia IC Ansmann, GJ Parra, JM Lanyon, JM Seddon Molecular Ecology 21 (18), 4472-4485 , 2012 2012 Citations: 93
Site fidelity, residency, and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.) in Adelaide's coastal waters, South Australia N Zanardo, GJ Parra, LM Möller Marine Mammal Science 32 (4), 1381-1401 , 2016 2016 Citations: 87
At the heart of the industrial boom: Australian snubfin dolphins in the Capricorn Coast, Queensland, need urgent conservation action D Cagnazzi, GJ Parra, S Westley, PL Harrison PloS one 8 (2), e56729 , 2013 2013 Citations: 75
High site fidelity and restricted ranging patterns in southern Australian bottlenose dolphins C Passadore, L Möller, F Diaz‐Aguirre, GJ Parra Ecology and evolution 8 (1), 242-256 , 2018 2018 Citations: 74
Conservation status of the Australian humpback dolphin (Sousa sahulensis) using the IUCN Red List Criteria GJ Parra, D Cagnazzi Advances in marine biology 73, 157-192 , 2016 2016 Citations: 68
Population differentiation and hybridisation of Australian snubfin (Orcaella heinsohni) and Indo-Pacific humpback (Sousa chinensis) dolphins in north-western Australia AM Brown, AM Kopps, SJ Allen, L Bejder, B Littleford-Colquhoun, ... PLoS One 9 (7), e101427 , 2014 2014 Citations: 68
Ensemble modelling of southern Australian bottlenose dolphin Tursiops sp. distribution reveals important habitats and their potential ecological function N Zanardo, GJ Parra, C Passadore, LM Möller Marine Ecology Progress Series 569, 253-266 , 2017 2017 Citations: 67
Distribution of Irrawaddy dolphins, Orcaella brevirostris, in Australian waters GJ Parra, C Azuma, AR Preen, PJ Corkeron, H Marsh Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, 141-154 , 2002 2002 Citations: 66
First insights into the effects of swim‐with‐dolphin tourism on the behavior, response, and group structure of southern Australian bottlenose dolphins KJ Peters, GJ Parra, PP Skuza, LM Möller Marine Mammal Science 29 (4), E484-E497 , 2013 2013 Citations: 64
Humpback dolphins: S. chinensis and S. teuszii GJ Parra, GJB Ross Encyclopedia of Marine Mammals (Second Edition), 576-582 , 2009 2009 Citations: 63
Modelling dolphin distribution to inform future spatial conservation decisions in a marine protected area C Passadore, LM Möller, F Diaz-Aguirre, GJ Parra Scientific reports 8 (1), 15659 , 2018 2018 Citations: 62