Abrar Hazoor
@polito.it
Department of Environment, Land, and Infrastructure Engineering
Politecnico di Torino, Italy
RESEARCH INTERESTS
Road Safety; Driving simulation; Advanced Driver Assistance System; Intelligent Speed Adaption System; Driver Behavior; Risk Mitigation
Scopus Publications
Scholar Citations
Scholar h-index
Scholar i10-index
Scopus Publications
M. Bassani, L. Catani, A. Hazoor, A. Hoxha, A. Lioi, A. Portera, and L. Tefa
Elsevier BV
Abrar Hazoor
Giordano Editore
An original in vehicle Intelligent Speed Adaptation System for Visibility (V-ISA) was designed to promote compliance with real-time speed management. The functionality of V-ISA is based on the prevailing sight conditions along the road, and operates in two variants: (i) providing visual information, and (ii) vehicle speed intervention. A road scenario with the driver performing merging and diverging manoeuvres in a motorway section was designed. A within-subject experiment involved 32 participants and a vehicle equipped with the two variants and the system off (baseline condition) under two traffic flow conditions. V ISA had a significant positive effect on the drivers’ longitudinal performance along ramps. This change in behaviour along ramps had no effect on merging and diverging manoeuvres. V ISA had a positive impact on driver speed behaviour in such complex road environment and assisted drivers to modulate the operating speed towards the safe dynamic limits.
Alessandra Lioi, Alberto Portera, Luca Tefa, Abrar Hazoor, and Marco Bassani
Elsevier BV
Abrar Hazoor, Alberto Terrafino, Leandro L. Di Stasi, and Marco Bassani
Elsevier BV
Giorgia Raimondo, Alessandra Lioi, Abrar Hazoor, Alberto Portera, Luca Tefa, and Marco Bassani
SAGE Publications
Previous investigation has revealed that diverging maneuvers along curved terminals lead to a deterioration in the longitudinal and transversal performances of drivers with respect to linear ones. As a countermeasure, innovative horizontal markings (HMs) may be used to compel drivers to drive more prudently and maintain better vehicle control. In this driving simulation study, the behavioral effects of alternative HMs along curved exit ramp terminals were investigated. Forty-eight voluntary participants drove along randomly assigned exit ramp terminals, the design of which involved combinations of the following input variables: (i) horizontal markings (standard HM1, with internal lane bands HM2, with external zebra stripes HM3); (ii) lighting conditions (day and night); (iii) traffic flow in the motorway (1,000 passenger cars per hour pc/h and 3,000 pc/h), and (iv) ramp terminal connection type (continuous and reverse). Longitudinal (i.e., speed) and transversal (i.e., lateral position and diverging abscissa) behavioral data were collected. HM2 leads to greater improvements in the level of road safety thanks to better longitudinal and transversal driver behavior. However, drivers did delay their exit from the motorway with respect to the baseline condition (HM1) independent of the connection type. No relevant improvements were observed with HM3, apart from speed reductions at the end of the terminal and more centered trajectories when approaching the ramp. Results also show that drivers tended to enter the reverse terminal later than the continuous one (where drivers correctly used the taper), thus revealing that the use of the innovative HMs was not able to compensate for this inappropriate behavior adopted along reverse terminals.
A. Lioi, A. Hazoor, M. Castro, and M. Bassani
Elsevier BV
Abrar Hazoor, Alessandra Lioi, and Marco Bassani
SAGE Publications
Most existing roads were designed without considering the improved performance of modern vehicles and the new onboard technologies available for assisted driving. In addition, vehicles frequently travel at speeds that exceed the maximum considered in road design. For these reasons, the need for speed- and safety-related countermeasures (e.g., field control, mobile or fixed speed cameras, traffic calming measures) is evident. However, these countermeasures are only partially effective and the proportion of crashes that are speed-related remains significant. This investigation is aimed at the development of a new intelligent speed adaptation (ISA) system based on the available sight distance (ASD). In conditions of poor visibility, the system can (i) inform drivers when they are traveling at inappropriate speeds, or (ii) generate warning sounds to the same effect, or (iii) intervene directly and compel the vehicle to adopt the speed which is most appropriate to the particular ASD. As reported in this methodological paper, the functionality of the new ISA system was tested at the driving simulator of the Politecnico di Torino (Italy) and the resulting estimated ASD value was validated and tested successfully. Future experimental investigations will be devoted to assessing the effectiveness of the system on driver speed behavior and decision making.
Marco Bassani, Abrar Hazoor, and Lorenzo Catani
Elsevier BV
Abstract This paper focuses on the behaviours adopted by road users when negotiating horizontal curves with sight limitations. Experiments at a driving simulator were conducted on two-lane highways in which drivers were confronted with a range of sight conditions generated by the manipulation of variables such as curve direction, radii and distance of lateral sight obstructions along horizontal curves. It was observed that most of the drivers adopted strategies which resulted in a stopping distance shorter than the available sight distance, thereby maintaining safe driving conditions. Some drivers reduced their speed, some increased the lateral distance from any sight obstructions along the roadside, some did both, while others did neither. A preliminary analysis indicated that the safety benefits resulting from a vehicle speed reduction strategy significantly outweigh those from a lateral shift in the lane. Further analyses on the 1246 cases investigated offered further support for this proposition, while revealing that a higher proportion of drivers opted for the first strategy for safety reasons. Moreover, visibility conditions (safe, partially safe, and unsafe) played a role in the choice of driving strategies. Results provide evidence that a significant group of drivers used the two strategies under severely restricted visibility conditions (i.e., along sharp radius curves); however, the strategies selected were independent of the driver speed profile (i.e., slower, average, or faster).