DANIELA FRANCESCATO VEIGA

@ppg.unifesp.br

Federal University of Sao Paulo



              

https://researchid.co/danielafveiga

RESEARCH, TEACHING, or OTHER INTERESTS

Surgery

96

Scopus Publications

Scopus Publications

  • Milky secretion after late breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap with implant
    Gabriel de Almeida Arruda Felix, Ariane Garcia, Joel Veiga, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    GN1 Sistemas e Publicacoes Ltd.

  • Quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital as assessed by the patients
    Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira, José da Conceição Carvalho Júnior, Ricardo Beckhauser Kuhnen, Ana Laura Batista Coelho, Isabella Scavariello Zicari Di Monte, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the quality of breast reconstruction service at a university hospital, as assessed by the patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study enrolled adult women who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction by any technique performed at a university hospital between 1 and 24 months before the assessment. The Brazilian version of the Health Service Quality Scale (HSQS) was self-applied to the participants. The HSQS produces percentage scores, which are expressed in values ranging from 0 to 10 for each domain of the scale, and into an overall percentage quality score. The management team was asked to establish a minimum satisfactory score for the breast reconstruction service. Results: Ninety patients were included. The management team considered 8.00 the minimum satisfactory score for the service. The overall percentage score was 93.3%. Only one domain, ‘Support,’ had an average score lower than that considered satisfactory (7.22 ± 3.0); while the others had higher scores. The domain that scored highest was ‘Qualification’ (9.94 ± 0.3), followed by ‘Result’ (9.86 ± 0.4). There was a positive correlation between ‘type of oncologic surgery’ and ‘intentions of loyalty to the service’ (ρ = 0.272; p = 0.009) and a negative correlation between ‘education’ and ‘quality of the environment’ (ρ = –0.218; p = 0.039). The higher the patient’s level of education, the higher the score attributed to ‘relationship’ (ρ = 0.261; p = 0.013) and the lower the score of ‘aesthetics and functionality’ (ρ = –0.237; p = 0.024). Conclusions: The quality of the breast reconstruction service was considered satisfactory, but there is a demand for structural improvements, better interpersonal relationships, and a stronger support network for patients.

  • Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reduction Mammaplasty: A National Survey
    Ricardo Beckhauser Kuhnen, Miguel Sabino Neto, Lucas Vassalli Souza, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    Springer Science and Business Media LLC

  • Brazilian patients’ expectations regarding breast reconstruction
    L.C. Amaro, L.O. Faria, N.A. Santos, T.R. Pezzini, L.M. Ferreira, and D.F. Veiga

    Elsevier BV

  • Patient-Reported Outcomes after Subpectoral Breast Augmentation with Microtextured or Macrotextured Implants Using the BREAST-Q
    Alice Teixeira Leite, Miguel Sabino-Neto, Vanessa Contato Lopes Resende, Daniela Francescato Veiga, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Abstract Background Breast augmentation with implants is the most commonly performed cosmetic plastic surgery in Brazil and worldwide. The aim of this study was to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life following subpectoral breast augmentation with either microtextured or macrotextured implants, using the BREAST-Q. Methods A prospective study was conducted with 40 women with hypomastia undergoing subpectoral breast augmentation. The patients were randomly allocated to two groups to receive either microtextured or macrotextured breast implants. All participants were assessed preoperatively (baseline) and after 2 and 4 months of surgery for quality of life and patient satisfaction with the surgical results, using the BREAST-Q augmentation module, a patient-reported outcome measure. Results The patients had a mean age of 28.9 ± 6.45 years. The microtextured (n = 20) and macrotextured (n = 20) groups were homogeneous for sex, age, education level, marital status, and number of children (p > 0.05). Both groups showed significant improvement in satisfaction with breasts (p < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), and sexual well-being (p < 0.001) at the 2- and 4-month follow-up visits compared with baseline. The observed improvements were associated with high effect size values of 5.09, 3.44, and 3.90, respectively. In contrast, significant decreases from baseline in physical well-being scores (p = 0.001) were found 2 and 4 weeks after surgery in both groups. Conclusion Subpectoral breast augmentation with either microtextured or macrotextured breast implants improved satisfaction with breasts and quality of life in patients with hypomastia.

  • Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of BREAST-Q<sup>©</sup>: breast reconstruction expectations module
    Iara Gama Esteves de Oliveira, Miguel Sabino Neto, Luciana Chamone Amaro, Henrique Kenji Uehara, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    OBJECTIVE This study aimed to translate the BREAST-Q© - Breast Reconstruction Expectations Module (preoperative) 2.0 into Portuguese and adapt it to the Brazilian cultural context. METHODS Authorization for translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire was obtained from the holders of the instrument's distribution rights. The questionnaire was translated and retro-translated. For cultural adaptation, the instrument was applied to 40 patients who had breast reconstruction surgery scheduled. Cronbach's alpha was used to assess the internal consistency. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 53.5 years, and the majority (72.5%) was undergoing reconstruction with implants. Good and excellent internal consistencies were observed for the Coping and Appearance expectations scales (Cronbach's alpha values of 0.878 and 0.909, respectively). For the Pain scale, the internal consistency was moderate (0.738), and it was acceptable (0.587) for the Medical team. CONCLUSION The BREAST-Q© - Breast Reconstruction Expectations Module (preoperative) 2.0 was successfully translated and adapted to the Brazilian context.

  • Reply: Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Daniela Francescato Veiga, Edgard da Silva Garcia, Miguel Sabino-Neto, and Lydia M. Ferreira

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    BACKGROUND Reduction mammaplasty is a well-established procedure. Studies have shown benefits of using antibiotics in this procedure. Nevertheless, there is no solid evidence to support postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The authors evaluated the influence of postoperative antibiotic delivery on infection rates after reduction mammaplasty. METHODS The authors conducted a randomized trial of noninferiority, with two parallel groups, with triple blinding. The participants were 124 women with breast hypertrophy, with reduction mammaplasty already scheduled, selected consecutively. All patients underwent reduction mammaplasty, performed by the same surgical team, using the superomedial pedicle technique for ascending the nipple-areola complex. All patients received cephalothin (1 g) intravenously at the anesthetic induction and every 6 hours for 24 hours. At hospital discharge, they were assigned randomly to either the placebo (n = 62) or antibiotic group (n = 62) and were instructed to take identical capsules containing 500 mg of cephalexin or placebo, respectively, every 6 hours, for 7 days. Patients were assessed weekly, for 4 weeks, regarding the occurrence of surgical-site infection, by a surgeon who was unaware of the allocation. The criteria and definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were adopted. RESULTS There was no statistical difference between groups regarding age, body mass index, or resected breast tissue weight. The overall surgical-site infection rate was 0.81 percent. Only one patient, allocated to the antibiotic, presented infection, classified as superficial incisional (p = 1.00). In the placebo group, surgery time was higher (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION The maintenance of antibiotics in the postoperative period of reduction mammaplasty did not influence the rates of surgical-site infection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, I.

  • Publications, by different surgical specialties, on patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic surgery
    Rafael Silva Araújo, Caio Vinicius Leone, Pedro Gabriel Dotto, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the publications authored by plastic surgeons with those from other specialties' surgeons on patient-reported outcomes of oncoplastic surgery. METHODS A review was carried out on the Medline database, emcompassing five years (2015-2020). Studies about partial breast reconstruction after conservative treatment, immediate or delayed, by any technique, which presented patient-reported outcomes, were included. RESULTS We found 292 articles, from which 142 met the eligibility criteria. Publications were stratified into groups 1 (plastic surgeons) and 2 (other surgical specialties), and also into groups A (only plastic surgeons), B (only other specialties) and C (both), and compared statistically. Most publications (60.6%) were attributed to specialties other than plastic surgery. Nineteen percent had only plastic surgeons as authors, 50% only other specialties' surgeons, and 31% had both. There was no difference between groups regarding the impact factor of the journals in any of the stratifications, and the majority was published in journals with impact factor ≤2. CONCLUSION: In the last years, surgeons from specialties other than plastic surgery published more about the results of the oncoplastic surgery reported by the patients. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the impact factor of the journals.

  • Mammoplasty: Steps for safe surgery. evidence from literature
    PAULO ROGÉRIO Q. DO E. SANTO, DANIELA FRANCESCATO VEIGA, RICARDO FROTA BOGGIO, FELIPE LEHMANN COUTINHO, ANNE GROTH, ADRIANO GUIMARÃES BRASOLIN, and LYDIA MASAKO FERREIRA

    GN1 Genesis Network
    Introduction: Mammoplasty is one of the most performed surgeries by plastic surgeons. Like every procedure, it is not free of risks or complications. Objectives: Discuss controversial issues and complications in breast surgery and main treatments. Methods: Four full members of the SBCP with extensive experience in breast plastic surgery participated in the discussion, in addition to the regent of the mammoplasty chapter. Factors that presented the greatest controversy in mammoplasties were evaluated: use of antibiotics; preoperative infiltration; association of mammoplasty with breast implants; large mammary ptoses; masculinizing mammoplasty; flaps for the elevation of the nippleareola complex (NAC); use of drains; dressings in mammoplasties and fat grafting. Results: The literature and discussion among specialists generated the observations: there is robust evidence of the effectiveness in the use of perioperative antibiotics of reducing mammoplasties, but there is no evidence of benefits in maintaining use for more than 24 hours; preoperative infiltration with vasoconstrictor solutions does not reduce the incidence of hematoma; in mammoplasty associated with implants there was no consensus on the best technique, plane or texture of the implant; there was no consensus on the best technique in the elevation of NAC in large ptoses, whether grafts or flaps; masculinizing mammoplasty does not present complications different from those found in the literature; there is no specific protocol for conduct when there is suffering from the NAC; dressings can be removed on the first postoperative day or kept longer, and there should be parsimony in the fat graft. Conclusion: The present study concluded that mammoplasty is safe surgery, but continued studies are needed to minimize complications. ■ ABSTRACT

  • Alcohol (70%) versus alcoholic chlorhexidine solution (0.5%) in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks: A randomized clinical trial
    LUIZ CARLOS SOUZA TOSTES, ANA BEATRIZ ALKMIM TEIXEIRA LOYOLA, ADILSON DE OLIVEIRA FRAGA, LETÍCIA AZEVEDO GAZZI, LUIZ FRANCISLEY DE PAIVA, YARA JULIANO, and DANIELA FRANCESCATO VEIGA

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    ABSTRACT Objective: to compare the use of 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine and 70% alcohol in skin antisepsis for neuraxial blocks. Method: this is a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial, with two parallel arms. Seventy patients who were candidates for neuraxial block were randomly allocated to group A (n = 35), in whom antisepsis was performed with 0.5% alcoholic chlorhexidine, or to group B (n = 35), in whom we used 70% hydrated ethyl alcohol. Swabs were harvested for culture at three times: before antisepsis, two minutes after application of the antiseptic, and immediately after puncture. The samples were sown in three culture media and the number of colony forming units (CFU) per cm² was counted. Results: there was no difference between the groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, time to perform the block or type of block. There were no differences between groups in the CFU/cm² counts before antisepsis. There was less bacterial growth in group B two minutes after application of the antiseptic (p = 0.048), but there was no difference between the groups regarding the number of CFU/cm² at the end of the puncture. Conclusion: 70% alcohol was more effective in reducing the number of CFU/cm² after two minutes, and there was no difference between the two groups regarding skin colonization at the end of the procedure. These results suggest that 70% alcohol may be an option for skin antisepsis before neuraxial blocks. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02833376.

  • Brazilian version of the Breast-Q<sup>©</sup>—Breast-Conserving Therapy Module 2.0: Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and reproducibility
    Tatiane de Sousa Schunck, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Felipe Andreotta Cavagna, Grisotto LE, Sabino Neto M, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Hindawi Limited

  • Effectiveness of Brazilian national health policy for mammogram screening in women aged over 50 years
    Renata Bites Ferreira Amorim, Fabíola Soares Moreira Campos, Leonardo Larrubia Silveira, Ivanildo Archangelo Junior, Neil Ferreira Novo, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    Hindawi Limited
    1Professional Graduate Program in Sciences Applied to Health, Universidade do Vale do Sapucai (UNIVAS), Pouso Alegre, Brazil 2Breast Surgery Division, UNIVAS, Pouso Alegre, Brazil 3Medical School, UNIVAS, Pouso Alegre, Brazil 4Department of Biostatistics, Universidade de Santo Amaro (UNISA), Sao Paulo, Brazil 5Translational Surgery Graduate Program, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil

  • Single dose versus 24 h antibiotic prophylaxis in reduction mammaplasty: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Daniela Francescato Veiga, Edgard da Silva Garcia, José Wilson Moreira-Filho, Evelyne Borges de Mattos Andrade, Yara Juliano, Joel Veiga-Filho, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Springer Science and Business Media LLC

  • Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Edgard S. Garcia, Daniela F. Veiga, Joel Veiga-Filho, Isaías V. Cabral, Natália L. L. Pinto, Neil F. Novo, Miguel Sabino-Neto, and Lydia M. Ferreira

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Background: Reduction mammaplasty is a well-established procedure. Studies have shown benefits of using antibiotics in this procedure. Nevertheless, there is no solid evidence to support postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. The authors evaluated the influence of postoperative antibiotic delivery on infection rates after reduction mammaplasty. Methods: The authors conducted a randomized trial of noninferiority, with two parallel groups, with triple blinding. The participants were 124 women with breast hypertrophy, with reduction mammaplasty already scheduled, selected consecutively. All patients underwent reduction mammaplasty, performed by the same surgical team, using the superomedial pedicle technique for ascending the nipple-areola complex. All patients received cephalothin (1 g) intravenously at the anesthetic induction and every 6 hours for 24 hours. At hospital discharge, they were assigned randomly to either the placebo (n = 62) or antibiotic group (n = 62) and were instructed to take identical capsules containing 500 mg of cephalexin or placebo, respectively, every 6 hours, for 7 days. Patients were assessed weekly, for 4 weeks, regarding the occurrence of surgical-site infection, by a surgeon who was unaware of the allocation. The criteria and definitions of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention were adopted. Results: There was no statistical difference between groups regarding age, body mass index, or resected breast tissue weight. The overall surgical-site infection rate was 0.81 percent. Only one patient, allocated to the antibiotic, presented infection, classified as superficial incisional (p = 1.00). In the placebo group, surgery time was higher (p = 0.003). Conclusion: The maintenance of antibiotics in the postoperative period of reduction mammaplasty did not influence the rates of surgical-site infection. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

  • Antibiotic prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery. A randomized controlled trial
    Rubens Murilo de Athayde Prudencio, Fabíola Soares Moreira Campos, Ana Beatriz Alkmim Teixeira Loyola, Ivanildo Archangelo Junior, Neil Ferreira Novo, Lydia Masako Ferreira, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    Abstract Purpose To assess the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on surgical site infection (SSI) rates in women undergoing breast cancer surgery in two tertiary hospitals in Brazil. Methods This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 124 women without independent risk factors for SSI were randomly assigned to receive either cefazolin (antibiotic group, n = 62) or placebo (control group, n = 62) as preoperative prophylaxis. After surgery, all surgical wounds were examined once a week, for four weeks, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions and classifications for SSI. Results Baseline characteristics were homogeneous between the two groups. Only one patient in the antibiotic group developed SSI, which was classified as superficial incisional. The overall SSI rate was low, with no significant difference between groups. Conclusion Antibiotic prophylaxis had no significant effect on reducing SSI rates in women without independent risk factors for SSI undergoing breast cancer surgery.

  • Cross-cultural validation of the face-q satisfaction with facial appearance overall scale (Face-q sfaos) in brazilian rhytidoplasty patients
    José Teixeira Gama, Luís Antônio Rossetto, Nathalya Botelho Brito, Daniela Francescato Veiga, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Elsevier BV
    OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to culturally validate the FACE-Q - Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall Scale (Face-Q SFAOS) in a population of Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients. METHOD: Authorization for the translation and validation of the questionnaire was obtained from the FACE-Q SFAOS distribution rights holders. The FACE-Q SFAOS was translated and then back-translated. For cultural validation, a total of 57 women were selected 5 to 8 months after undergoing rhytidoplasty. Twenty of them participated in the cultural adaptation, 30 participated in the reproducibility analysis, and 57 participated in the construct validation. RESULTS: The analysis identified two factors (general appearance and face geometry) that exhibited excellent internal consistency. The total satisfaction score, which comprised nine items, also presented excellent internal consistency. Good reproducibility was found for Overall Appearance, Geometry and Total. There was a difference in the satisfaction means (total and factors) between procedure locations; patients undergoing frontal, upper eyelid and lower eyelid procedures were less satisfied than those who did not undergo such procedures. Satisfaction was higher with geometry than with overall face appearance. CONCLUSION: The FACE-Q SFAOS was adapted to the cultural context of Brazilian rhytidoplasty patients and was reproducible, and the scale exhibited face, content and construct validity.

  • Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Published By Plastic Surgeons: Long-Term Follow-Up
    Thiago Bezerra de Morais, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Joel Veiga-Filho, Andréia Cristina Feitosa do Carmo, Rosely de Fátima Pellizzon, Yara Juliano, Miguel Sabino-Neto, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Springer Science and Business Media LLC


  • Physical activity, functional ability, and quality of life after breast cancer surgery
    K.P. Fontes, D.F. Veiga, A.C. Naldoni, M. Sabino-Neto, and L.M. Ferreira

    Elsevier BV

  • Quality of randomized clinical trials published by plastic surgeons: a long-term follow-up study
    THIAGO BEZERRA MORAIS, DANIELA FRANCESCATO VEIGA, MIGUEL SABINO NETO, and LYDIA MASAKO FERREIRA

    GN1 Genesis Network
    1 Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Conflicts of interest: none. Introduction: In two previous studies, the quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon was assessed in two periods: from 1966 to 2003 and from 2004 to 2008. The objective is to evaluate the evolution of the quality of RCTs published by plastic surgeons in the subsequent five-year period, from 2009 to 2013. Methods: RCTs published from 2009 to 2013, in English, with the participation of at least one plastic surgeon, were identified by an electronic search and classified according to allocation concealment by two independent evaluators. The quality of the studies with adequate allocation concealment was evaluated by two evaluators using the Delphi List and the Jadad Scale. Results: Of the 6,997 identified studies, 261 were classified according to allocation concealment. Of these, 43 (16.47%) had adequate allocation concealment. According to an assessment conducted using the Delphi List, there was an improvement in the items “most important characteristics of the prognosis” (p < 0.001), “use of an independent evaluator” (p = 0.0029), and “measures of variability and estimation of points for the primary variable” (p = 0.0057) compared to the 1966-2003 assessment ; there was no difference in the assessment of the same items from 2004-2008. Regarding the Jadad Scale, there was an increase in the scores from 2009 to 2013 compared to the 1996-2003 period (p < 0.0004); however, there was no significant difference in the 2004-2008 period. Conclusion: There was no difference in the quality of the RCTs published by plastic surgeons in the 2009-2013 period compared to the previous five-year period (2004 to 2008). However, both periods indicated higher quality compared to the 1966-2003 period. ■ ABSTRACT

  • Bioceramic cement in the filling of bone defects in rats
    Christiano Cândido Zerbinatti, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Monique Amanda Bastista Oliveira, Fiorita Gonzales Lopes Mundim, Rodrigo Machado Pereira, Francisco Azevedo, Taylor Brandão Schnaider, and José Dias da Silva Neto

    FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
    Abstract Purpose To evaluate PBS®MCIMMO cement in the filling of bone defects. Methods Thirty-six adult male Wistar rats were divided into three groups of twelve individuals each (group 1, group 2 and group 3). In all groups, a bone failure in the femur was induced, 2.0 mm wide and 7.0 mm deep. In group 1, the PBS®MCIMMO cement was applied to the bone defect produced and a titanium implant (CONNECTION®) 1.5 mm thick and 6 mm long was installed. In group 2, only the PBS® CIMMO cement was installed. In group 3, only bone failure was performed. Kruskal Wallis tests were performed to compare the mean area among the three groups. Results In all comparisons, significance was observed for group 2 (p = 0.0014–0.0026). Conclusion The PBS®CIMMO cement induced bone neoformation, and integration between the newly formed bone, cement, and implant was observed.

  • Sexuality, depression and body image after breast reconstruction
    Silvania de Cassia Vieira Archangelo, Miguel Sabino, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Elvio Bueno Garcia, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Elsevier BV
    OBJECTIVES To evaluate the impact of breast reconstruction after mastectomy on sexual function, body image, and depression. METHODS This cross-sectional, comparative, controlled study was conducted with 90 women between 18 and 65 years of age who had undergone either mastectomy alone (mastectomy group, n=30) or mastectomy combined with breast reconstruction (mastectomy-reconstruction group, n=30) at least one year prior to the study or who had no breast cancer (control group, n=30). Patients were assessed for sexual function, depression, and body image using the validated Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Female Sexual Function Index, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the Body Dysmorphic Disorder Examination, respectively. RESULTS The three groups were homogeneous for age, marital status, body mass index, and education level. The women in the mastectomy group reported significantly worse sexual function, greater depressive symptoms, and lower body image than those in the mastectomy-reconstruction and control groups. In the mastectomy group, the frequency of sexual dysfunction was significantly greater among patients without a marital partner and those with a higher level of education than among patients in the other two groups with the same characteristics. CONCLUSION Patients who had undergone breast reconstruction after mastectomy reported better sexual function and body image and fewer depressive symptoms than patients who had undergone mastectomy alone. Sexual dysfunction was associated with the absence of a marital partner and a higher level of education and was more frequent in the mastectomy group.

  • Work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot
    Helga dos Santos Cabeceira, Diba Maria Sebba Tosta de Souza, Yara Juliano, and Daniela Francescato Veiga

    Elsevier BV
    OBJECTIVE: To assess work ability and productivity in patients with diabetic foot. METHODS: This investigation was a cross-sectional controlled study. A total of 117 individuals were selected from March to June 2014 and allocated to group A (patients without diabetes, n=43), group B (diabetes patients without foot ulcers, n=43), or group C (patients with diabetic foot, n=31). Two validated instruments, the Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ) and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire General Health v2.0 (WPAI-GH), were used to assess work ability and productivity. RESULTS: The groups were homogeneous regarding age and sex; however, patients in group C had a lower education level than the other participants (p=0.006). The median WLQ scores for groups A, B, and C were 0.0121, 0.0146, and 0.0852, respectively (p<0.0001). The WPAI-GH scores revealed a mean productivity loss of 20% for groups A and B and 100% for group C (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetic foot showed decreased work ability and productivity.

  • Breast Reconstruction May Improve Work Ability and Productivity after Breast Cancer Surgery
    Carolina Cristina Farias Ortega, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Kamila Camargo, Yara Juliano, Miguel Sabino Neto, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
    Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate work ability and productivity in women who had undergone different types of surgical treatment for breast cancer, as well as breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Methods This cross-sectional study assessed 152 women between 30 and 60 years of age, who worked outside the home in formal or informal jobs, or as self-employed. Thirty-eight of them had no history of breast cancer (control group), and 114 had undergone surgical treatment for breast cancer at least 1 year before their enrollment in the study, and were allocated as follows: mastectomy group (n = 38), breast-conserving surgery group (n = 38), or breast reconstruction breast reconstruction group (n = 38). The validated Brazilian versions of the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment-General Health questionnaire and Work Limitations Questionnaire were self-administered. Results The groups were homogeneous regarding age, education level, and other sociodemographic characteristics. Patients in the mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery groups showed reduced work performance and productivity compared with women in the breast reconstruction and control groups (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0006, respectively). In addition, women in the mastectomy group had more difficulty in performing activities of daily living compared with those in other groups (P = 0.0121). Conclusions Women who had undergone mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery had decreased work ability and productivity compared with women without a history of breast cancer and to those who had undergone breast reconstruction.

  • Breast Hypertrophy, Reduction Mammaplasty, and Body Image
    Cristiane Costa Fonseca, Daniela Francescato Veiga, Edgard da Silva Garcia, Isaías Vieira Cabral, Monique Maçais de Carvalho, Maria José Azevedo de Brito, and Lydia Masako Ferreira

    Oxford University Press (OUP)
    Background Body image dissatisfaction is one of the major factors that motivate patients to undergo plastic surgery. However, few studies have associated body satisfaction with reduction mammaplasty. Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of breast hypertrophy and reduction mammaplasty on body image. Methods Breast hypertrophy patients, with reduction mammaplasty already scheduled between June 2013 and December 2015 (mammaplasty group, MG), were prospectively evaluated through the body dysmorphic disorder examination (BDDE), body investment scale (BIS), and breast evaluation questionnaire (BEQ55) tools. Women with normal-sized breasts were also evaluated as study controls (normal-sized breast group, NSBG). All the participants were interviewed at the initial assessment and after six months. Data were analyzed before and after six months. Results Each group consisted of 103 women. The MG group had a significant improvement in BDDE, BIS, and BEQ55 scores six months postoperatively (P ≤ 0.001 for the three instruments), whereas the NSBG group showed no alteration in results over time (P = 0.876; P = 0.442; and P = 0.184, respectively). In the intergroup comparison it was observed that the MG group began to invest more in the body, similarly to the NSBG group, and surpassed the level of satisfaction and body image that the women of the NSBG group had after the surgery. Conclusions Reduction mammaplasty promoted improvement in body image of women with breast hypertrophy. Level of Evidence 2