Marita Brcic Kuljis
@ffst.unist.hr
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split
Marita Brčić Kuljiš is an Associate Professor at Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of Philosophy, University of Split. Area of scientific interest: political philosophy (democracy, multiculturalism, justice, ethics and migration policy), philosophy of education (reflective practice, critical thinking and adult education). She holds lectures in Philosophy of Politics, Philosophy of Democracy, Philosophy of Justice, Introduction to the Philosophy of Multiculturalism, Philosophy of Education, etc. She is a member of Croatian Philosophical Society and Society for Applied Philosophy. She is a member of Editorial Board of the Filozofska istraživanja (Philosophical Investigations), Synthesis Philosophica scientific journals and Journal of Croatian Studies. She publishes scientific papers from political philosophy, justice, human rights and education. As lecturer and organizer, she participates in many domestic and international scientific conferences and summer schools. Re
EDUCATION
1999→2005 MA Philosophy and Sociology; University of Zadar, Obala kralja P. Krešimira IV. br. 2, 23000 Zadar
2006 →2012 PhD in Political Philosophy/Humanities; University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, I. Lučića 2, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
• The British Scholarship Trust, University of Wales, Swansea, UK (may/june 2010);
• Bayhost Scholarship, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Germany (2009-2010)
• Fulbright Scholarship, University of Georgia, US (January 2023 – May 2023)
RESEARCH, TEACHING, or OTHER INTERESTS
Social Sciences, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Education
Scopus Publications
Scholar Citations
Scholar h-index
Scholar i10-index
Scopus Publications
Marita Brčić Kuljiš and Tea Gutović
Common Ground Research Networks
Marita Brčić Kuljiš
Common Ground Research Networks
Marita Brčić Kuljiš
Croatian Philosophical Society (Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo)
Već se duže vrijeme govori o neuspjehu multikulturalizma. Štoviše, izjave su vodećih europskih političara zapravo potvrdile ono u što se sumnjalo. Kada to postane stav država članica zajednice koja svojim temeljnim dokumentima zagovara ‘jednakost u različitosti’, to postaje zabrinjavajuće. Kao antitezu neuspjehu odnosno smrti multikulturalizma stavljamo život Mediterana, iz više razloga. Prvi je razlog taj što se za Mediteran uvijek konstatira multikulturalnost. Mediteran je po sebi multikulturalan i on je rasadište kulturnog pluralizma u Zapadnoj Europi. Drugi je razlog mediteranska ruta kojom veliki broj imigranata pokušava doći u Europsku uniju, upravo sada kada je ona proglasila neuspjeh multikulturalizma. Odnos između Europske unije i Mediterana povijesno je duboko složen. Duboko povezan i duboko razdvojen. U ovom ćemo se radu dotaknuti samo djelića tog složenog odnosa.
Marita Brčić Kuljiš
Common Ground Research Networks
Marita Brčić Kuljiš and Tea Gutović
Springer International Publishing
Marita Brčić Kuljiš
Croatian Philosophical Society (Hrvatsko filozofsko drustvo)
Marita Brčić Kuljiš and Niksa Alfirevic
Common Ground Research Networks
This paper explores the empirical analysis of a hypothesis related to the existence of significant differences among students of social science and business, as related to their value orientation(s) and worldview. Special attention is paid to the students’ perception of social justice and fairness. The paper firstly draws upon the existing results of value surveys, which are applicable to the student population. Further, it is hypothesized that significant differences in value orientations exist between students of business administration and social sciences/humanities, as well as that those differences can be linked to the decisions, relevant to their career choices. The human resource management implications, relevant for the successful motivation and performance management of the surveyed student population, will be identified as well. Methodology of the study is based on the Rokeach value survey, which has been validated and discussed multiple times since the 1970s. The methodological choice of the research instrument is based on the availability of comparable empirical research results in multiple countries and contexts, as well as on its validation in different fields of social science, including sociology, social psychology, anthropology, etc. The obtained results are analyzed and visualized by using the SPSS application software.
Marita Brčić Kuljiš and Anita Lunić
Springer International Publishing