Ekaterina S. Mishchenko
@volgmed.ru
Department of toxicological and analytical chemistry
Volgograd State Medical University
RESEARCH, TEACHING, or OTHER INTERESTS
Pharmacology (medical), Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics, Drug Discovery, Pharmaceutical Science
Scopus Publications
Scopus Publications
A. S. Ametov, I. E. Shokhin, E. A. Rogozhina, T. G. Bodrova, M. E. Nevretdinova, P. A. Bely, K. Ya. Zaslavskaya, V. S. Scherbakova, D. V. Kurkin, K. N. Koryanova,et al.
Volgograd State Medical University
Semaglutide is a representative of analogues of the incretin hormone human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and is currently used in Russia for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; in monotherapy and in combination therapy), including patients with obesity and overweight.The aim of the work was to conduct a comparative assessment of the physicochemical properties, a biological activity, bioequivalence and safety, including tolerability and immunogenicity, of the drug Quincent® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) and the drug Ozempic® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark) when administered to healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. To assess the degree of similarity of the study drug Quincenta® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) with a chemically synthesized active substance to the original (reference) drug Ozempic® (semaglutide, 1.34 mg/ml, a solution for a subcutaneous administration, Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark), a comparative study of physicochemical properties and a biological activity was carried out. To assess the bioequivalence of the study drug and the reference drug, an open randomized parallel comparative study with the participation of healthy volunteers (n=54), 54 participants of which had been included in the population, was conducted. The volunteers were randomized into 2 groups in a 1:1 ratio, and received a single dose subcutaneously either of the study drug (domestic semaglutide at a dose of 0.5 mg) or the reference drug (foreign semaglutide at a dose of 0.5 mg). The mode of administration was in the morning on an empty stomach. A semaglutide concentration was determined in serum samples using a previously validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. A quantitative determination of antibodies to semaglutide in the human serum by ELISA was carried out with a microplate photometer using ready-made kits pre-validated by the manufacturer. The conclusion about the bioequivalence of the compared drugs was made using an approach based on the assessment of 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the geometric mean values of the parameters Cmax, AUC(0–t) of semaglutide in the measurement original units.Results. The results of the comparative analysis of the study drug and the reference drug demonstrate the comparability of their physicochemical properties and biological activity. The results of the clinical study demonstrated the bioequivalence of the test drug and the reference drug. Thus, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other: the Cmax value for the study drug was 42.088±8.827 ng/ml, for the reference drug Ozempic® it was 42.2556±7.84. Herewith, the half-life for the study drug and the reference drug was 168.39±39.47 and 157.99±28.57 hours, respectively. The resulting 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the Cmax and AUC0–t values of the study drug and the reference drug were 90.89–109.15 and 91.66–111.27%, respectively. The tolerability of the drugs in the volunteers was notified as good. No adverse events were recorded during the study. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. According to the results of the immunogenicity analysis, no antibodies to Russian-made semaglutide were detected in the blood serum of the volunteers, which indicated the lack of Results. The results of a comparative analysis of the study drug and the reference drug demonstrate the comparability of physicochemical properties and biological activity. The results of the clinical study demonstrated the bioequivalence of the study drug and the reference drug. Thus, the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other: the Cmax value for the study drug was 42.088±8.827 ng/ml, for the reference drug Ozempic® this figure was 42.2556±7.84. At the same time, the half-life for the study drug and the reference drug was 168.39±39.47 and 157.99±28.57 hours, respectively. The resulting 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the Cmax and AUC0–t values of the study drug and the reference drug were 90.89–109.15 and 91.66–111.27%, respectively. Tolerability of the drugs in volunteers was noted as good. No adverse events were recorded during the study. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. According to the results of the immunogenicity analysis, no antibodies to Russian-made semaglutide were detected in the blood serum of the volunteers, which indicated the lack of the drug immunogenicity.Conclusion. In the course of the study, the comparability of the physicochemical properties and biological activity of the studied Russian drug with the chemically synthesized active substance Quincenta® to the reference drug Ozempic® was confirmed: the activity range of the studied drugs was within 80–120% in relation to the standard sample of semaglutide. The bioequivalence and a similar safety profile, including the immunogenicity and tolerability of the Russian drug Quincenta® (semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml, Promomed Rus LLC, Russia) were shown in comparison with the foreign drug Ozempic® (semaglutide 1.34 mg/ml, Novo Nordisk A/C, Denmark).
A. S. Ametov, I. E. Shokhin, E. A. Rogozhina, T. G. Bodrova, M. E. Nevretdinova, P. A. Bely, K. Ya. Zaslavskaya, D. V. Kurkin, K. N. Koryanova, E. S. Mishchenko,et al.
Volgograd State Medical University
Liraglutide is one of the analogues of the incretin hormone human glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and is currently a priority treatment for diseases such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (mono- and combination therapy), obesity and overweight in the presence of at least one concomitant disease.The aim of the work was to assess the bioequivalence and comparability of the safety and tolerability profile of the drug Enligria® (liraglutide 6 mg/ml, Promomed RUS LLC, Russia) and the drug Saxenda® (liraglutide 6 mg/ml, Novo Nordisk AS, Denmark) after a single dose in healthy volunteers.Materials and methods. This study was an open-label, randomized, crossover comparative study to evaluate pharmacokinetic parameters, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity. The study comprised 26 healthy volunteers, 26 of whom were included in the bioequivalence assessment population. The study consisted of 2 periods, in each of which the volunteers received either the test drug (liraglutide at a single dose of 0.6 mg) or the reference drug (liraglutide at a single dose of 0.6 mg) once. The washout period between each dose was 7 days. Blood plasma samples were taken to determine the concentration of liraglutide in the range from 0 to 72 hours in each study period. Liraglutide concentrations were determined using a previously validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method. A quantitative determination of antibodies to liraglutide in the blood serum samples was carried out using a microplate photometer and ready-made ELISA kits pre-validated by the manufacturer. The conclusion about the equivalence of the compared drugs was made based on the ratio of the parameters Cmax, AUC0→t and AUC0→t of the studied drug in relation to the reference one.Results. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs were comparable to each other. The resulting 90% confidence intervals for the ratio of the values of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ of the Russian test and reference drug were 87.18–110.46, 84.40–104.11 and 86.69–103.22% respectively, which satisfied the criteria for assessing bioequivalence. The tolerability of the drugs in the volunteers was notified as good. The incidence of adverse events was comparable for the test and reference drugs. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study. According to the results of the immunogenicity analysis, no antibodies to russian produced liraglutide were detected in the blood serum of the volunteers, which indicated the lack of the drug immunogenicity.Conclusion. During the study, the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the test and reference drugs was confirmed. The Russian drug Enligria® (liraglutide 6 mg/ml, Promomed RUS LLC, Russia) in comparison with a foreign drug Saxenda® (liraglutide 6 mg/ml, Novo Nordisk AS, Denmark).
E. S. Mischenko, J. S. Lazaryan, and A. Jh. Lazaryan
Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics Ltd
Introduction. Quinazoline derivatives have a wide range of pharmacological properties, which makes this group quite unique among other classes of heterocyclic compounds. Substance VMA-10-18, which has cerebrovasodilating, antidepressant, anxiolytic and nootropic properties, may become a promising new drug. In this regard, an urgent task is to develop methods for standardizing this substance.Aim. Development of a method for the quantitation of related impurities of a new biologically active substance VMA-10-18 (Quinazophene) by HPLC with subsequent statistical processing of the results.Materials and methods. To develop the conditions for chromatographic analysis, was used a highly purified substance 3-[2-(4-methoxyphenylamino)-2-oxoethyl]-quinazolin-4(3H)-one, as well as its related impurities: impurity I (unsubstituted quinazolin-4(3H)-one) and impurity II (4-methoxychloroacetanilide). Test solutions were prepared using volumetric glassware of accuracy class 1. Ethyl alcohol 95 % was used as a solvent. Chromatography was performed using a Dionex UltiMate 3000 system (Dionex, United States) with a spectrophotometric detector. The analysis was carried out at a wavelength of 231 nm. Data collection and processing was carried out using the Chromeleon v.7 system. A mixture of acetonitrile and orthophosphoric acid was used as a mobile phase. The analysis was performed in an isocratic mode. The validation of the developed method was carried out taking into account the requirements of the State Pharmacopeia of Russian Federation XIV edition and the recommendations of the ICH.Results and discussion. The optimal conditions for chromatography of the VMA-10-18 substance and its impurities have been developed. It was found that for a clear separation of the peaks of the substance and impurities among themselves, the mobile phase should contain acetonitrile and orthophosphoric acid in a ratio of 80 : 20. The specificity of the method was determined by chromatography of ethyl alcohol in order to exclude its influence on the analysis results. The linearity and correctness of the method were determined at 7 levels of concentration of impurities of the substance. The correlation coefficient has exceeded 0.99. Also, the free term of the linear dependence equation (a) for both impurities was less than its confidence interval (Δа), which proves the absence of a systematic error of the method. When determining the "Convergence" indicator, the calculated relative standard deviation did not exceed 2 %. When determining the intralaboratory precision, Student's t-test and Fisher's F-test were calculated. Both indicators met the stated requirements.Conclusion. A method for the quantitative determination of impurities in the VMA-10-18 substance by HPLC has been developed and validated.
E. S. Mishchenko, A. D. Lazaryan, and T. T. Lihota
Center of Pharmaceutical Analytics Ltd
Introduction. The aim idea of this research article is a development of the quantitative determination of a biologically active substance quinazolin4(3H)-on derivate with laboratory cypher «VMA-10-182, by UV-spectrophotometry with followed validation. The substance is an effective remedy that combines several pharmacological effects, like an antidepressant, anxiolytic and nootropic. As a result of preclinical trials, the research compound has proven to be an effective remedy in the fight and prevention of acute cerebrovascular accident (stroke). The substance realized pharmacological effects by stimulating the production of nitric oxide by the endothelial cells of the brain. As aresult of stimulating is a vasodilation of the vessels and improvement of blood flow in the ischemic part of the vessels occur. Therefore, for introducing the biologically active substance into medical practice we need to develop ways to control the quality of substance.Aim. The objective of this research work is to develop a method of the quantitative determination of a biologically active substance, derivative quinazolin-4(3H)-on (laboratory sypher – VMA-10-18), by method of UV spectrophotometry. The results of the research work were validated.Materials and methods. In this research we used a substance VMA-10-18 wich was previously purified from the initial and intermediate products of the synthesis. This substance is a white crystalline powder, odorless, hygroscopic.Results and discussion. The quantitative content of the active substance derived quinazolin-4(3H)-on has been determined. The specific absorption rate was calculated, followed by statistical processing of the results. The validation was carried out according to the «Specificity», «Linearity», «Accuracy», «Repeatability». The results indicate the effectiveness of the developed methodology and experimental reproducibility.Conclusion. Researches of physicochemical properties show al us use 95 % ethanol as a solvent. As a result we developed a method for the quantitative determination of the substance which can be proposed for inclusion in the normative documents. The quantitative determination of the active substance in the test substance was established, and the specific absorption index was calculated. All information are statistically processed and meet the requirements of regulatory documentation.